The Media and Approval Voting
In our current plurality system the media plays a unique role.
By pinpointing the front runners, they help inform voters about
which candidates are "viable" and therefore worthy of a vote.
In other words, the media gets to decide, through polling or
less objective means, which candidates qualify as one of the
"two evils" in the selection of the "lesser of two evils."
Of course this role engenders a lot of hatred towards the media.
Much of this hatred is unwarranted since the media plays this
specific role only because the plurality voting system demands
it of them.
In the switch to Approval Voting, the media would not be as
obliged to act as a screener for selecting front runners.
However the media would be obliged to provide more information
on all candidates since every voter gets to vote up or down
on every candidate.
One notable advantage of Approval Voting is that polling
the public about their political preferences would be easier.
Currently polling can be tricky since the inclusion or
non-inclusion of minor candidates can wreck the validity
of the poll. With Approval Voting, however, asking likely
voters about their approval of a given candidate directly
translates to likely election results.
Of course there is a major disadvantage to the media with
Approval Voting. That is the simple fact that the incentive
for candidates to "go negative" and rely on attack ads
would be reduced in elections with three or more candidates.
This would reduce the sensational aspects of modern campaigns
which some media outlets would perceive as bad for business.
Of course it would also mean the re-emergence of issues and
messages as the key component of political campaigns.
Therefore media outlets that are able to do a good job
helping voters understand all of the issues and all of the
candidates would likely be rewarded with Approval Voting.
Ultimately we think that Approval Voting would be good
for the media. Without the heavy burden that they now
have of selecting front runners, they will engender more
good will and this will be good for business. There
is no reason to believe that sensational headlines will
go away entirely during campaign season. They will simply
occur less often with Approval Voting. This might actually
be a good for the media as the public is demonstrating
a growing willingness to turn off the media entirely rather
than subject themselves to the voracious and outrageous
negative campaigning that is the hallmark of today's campaigns.
|