Approval Voting for General Elections
Given the particular strengths of Approval Voting for
primaries, nonpartisan and special elections, one might
be tempted to discount the use of Approval Voting for
general elections. This, however, would be a mistake as
Approval Voting has important benefits for general
elections too.
One benefit is that election results are more accurate and
meaningful with Approval Voting. Since voters vote
sincerely more often and election results are expressed
as easy to understand approval rankings, election winners
and public policy advocates -- as well as everyone else --
will have more information about the voters' true desires.
This can help officeholders craft more acceptable public policy.
The increased accuracy of the results will help political
analysts to better understand voting trends and thus provide
additional insight into the American electorate. Candidates
and political parties will use this information to better
guage the effectiveness of their campaigns. In the same way
that companies generally respond to the actions of consumers,
political parties will be better able to respond to the voters.
Using Approval Voting will severely reduce the incidence
of "voter regret". Voter regret occurs whenever a voter, after
seeing the actual result of an election, realizes that their
vote was miscast since it helped a candidate win that they did
not find acceptable. Voter regret is quite common with
plurality voting whenever there are more than two candidates.
It also happens with ranked ballot systems such as Instant Runoff
Voting whenever three or more candidates are running viable
campaigns.
Finally, since the results of the election are expressed in the
form of an approval percentage, the winning officeholder will be
able to see if his or her popularity is holding up over time.
This is because it is simple for the media to conduct a poll
and calculate a new approval rating at any time. This aspect
of Approval Voting will increase the value of such polling and
will work to keep the officeholder accountable to the public.
|